COSSI research projects
|Title of project||Researchers||Project Dates||Host Institution and collaborating agencies||Description of Project|
|Understanding Parenting, Community and Vaccination (UPCAV)||Julie Leask, Stacy Carter, Paul Ward, Lesley Barclay, Kerrie Wiley, Katie Attwell, Catherine Helps, Adam Dunn, Angus Dawson, Claire Hooker, Paul Corben||2017 - 2020||University of Sydney School of Public Health and Flinders University||We will interview parents who don’t vaccinate their children to learn what influences their decisions. We will
then hold community juries and a public engagement process to refine strategies for responding to vaccination rejection that are acceptable to a
well informed citizenry, practical and ethically justified. This is an NHMRC funded project.
|Monitoring the gap between evidence and vaccination behaviour by sampling the location-specific consumption of health information from news and social media||Adam Dunn, Julie Leask,
Maryke Steffens, Amalie Dyda, Zubair Shah, Aditi Dey, Enrico Coiera, Kenneth Mandl, Mark Johnson
University of Sydney
|This NHMRC funded project grant will refine the ways that machine learning and network science can automatically classify vaccine information presented in news and social media, and estimate location-specific differences in the consumption of that information.|
|Understanding parental (mis)trust in vaccines for children: a qualitative study||Paul Ward, Julie Leask, Samantha Meyer, Philippa Rokkas, (Stacy Carter), Katie Attwell||2015-2017||Flinders University||This project uses qualitative analysis to engage with the interview transcripts of 20 vaccine hesitant or rejecting parents from Adelaide. A series of articles from the data explore parental (dis)trust in vaccination expert systems; trust in complementary and alternative medicine, parsing of risk, parenting and lifestyle choices, social milieus and construction of the ‘vaccinating herd.’|
|Conversations between complementary and alternative medicine practitioners and vaccine-hesitant parents: A qualitative study||Jane Frawley, Kerrie Wiley, Jon Adams, Kirsty McKenzie||2016-2017||University of Technology, Faculty of Health; University of Sydney School of Public Health||Studies show Complimentary Medicine practitioners are influential in the health care decisions of vaccine-hesitant parents, however we still know little about the daily routine care approaches and behaviours of CM practitioners in relation to vaccination advice. This research project will provide the first examination of the ways CM practitioners influence and communicate with parents about vaccination, with a view to directly helping manage consultations in the interests of safe, effective patient care.|
|Exploring attitudes of parents, from alternative lifestyle communities in Western Australia, towards immunisation. (“I Immunise”)||Colleen Fisher, Jane Jones, Katie Attwell, Michael Wise, Melanie Freeman||2014 – present||Immunisation Alliance of WA||This project gathered data from parents in Fremantle, WA, who were the target audiences of the “I Immunise” campaign. It uses qualitative analysis to explore semi-structured interview data obtained from 13 participants. This data has been combined with the project “Understanding parental (mis)trust in vaccines for children: a qualitative study” to contribute to the publications listed under that project.|
|Why do children get severe influenza and whooping cough?||Samantha Carlson, Kristine Macartney, Julie Leask, Camilla Scanlan, Helen Marshall, Nigel Crawford, Jim Buttery, and the Paediatric Active Disease Surveillance Network (PAEDS)||2016 – 2019||NCIRS, PAEDS, University of Sydney, and funded by an NHMRC Partnership Project Grant with with contributions from the state health departments of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Western Australia, Queensland and the Northern Territory||This project uses mixed-methods research with parents of children who have been hospitalised for influenza and pertussis. It is uses the social ecological model (SEM) as a framework to determine how social networks, organisations, communities, and policies influence a parent’s decision and action to vaccinate their child against pertussis and influenza. Results will be used to develop a causal pathway as well as practical recommendations to prevent children acquiring these vaccine preventable diseases.|
|Gaining insight into childhood vaccination refusal in the Byron Shire Community||Catherine Helps, Julie Leask, Lesley Barclay||2015- 2019||University of Sydney School of Public Health and the Byron Shire Community||This study will aim to develop a greater understanding of parents who chose not to vaccinate their children. It examines the Byron Shire community where childhood vaccination rates are lower than the Australian average and involves in-depth interviews with parents, health and education providers and focus groups with high school students.|
|Persuasive Communication Challenges in Increasing Vaccine Uptake||Lynne Eagle, Stephan Dahl, David R. Low||2016 - ongoing||James Cook University||Using the examples of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines, we are examining the factors that may inhibit vaccine uptake and discuss strategies that may improve acceptance and thus uptake of recommended vaccines across a range of population sectors. Particular emphasis is placed on the way that information from a range of electronic platforms, including social media is used in decision making and whether, and in what ways, social marketing strategies can be used to improve vaccination rates.|
|Aceso Project||Bronwyn Harman||Ongoing||Edith Cowan University||The Aceso Project is an ongoing research project that examines psychosocial factors in relation to vaccination and non-vaccination. Its main focus is on why parents in Australia do not vaccinate their children. Recent research has examined non-vaccination in Denmark, WA, and parents who vaccinate, partially vaccinate, and do not vaccinate their children (both papers under review).|
|Sharing Knowledge About Immunisation (SKAI)||Julie Leask, Nina Berry, Margie Danchin, Lyndal Trevena, Kristine Macartney, Tom Snelling, Paul Kinnersley, Holly Witteman||2014-2018||University of Sydney; NCIRS; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute; Melbourne University; Telethon Kids Institute; Laval University; Cardiff University||The SKAI Project will develop and evaluate a suite of tailored communication tools and resources for use in primary health care consultations about childhood vaccination. This intervention is designed to equip primary health care providers to address the communication and information needs of parents who are cautious, hesitant, or resistant to routine childhood vaccination|
|Randomised Controlled Evaluation of a Complex Intervention to Promote Uptake of School-based HPV Vaccination||Rachel Skinner, Cristyn Davies, Spring Cooper, Tanya Stoney, Helen Marshall, Jane Jones, Joanne Collins,Heidi Hutton, Adriana Parrella, Gregory Zimet, David G. Regan, Patti Whyte, Julia M. L. Brotherton, Peter Richmond, Kirsten McCaffrey, Suzanne M. Garland, Julie Leask, Melissa Kang, Peter Richmond, Annette Braunack-Mayer, John Kaldor, Kevin McGeechan||2012-current||Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, & Children’s Hospital Westmead, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Australia||The National Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Program in Australia commenced in 2007 for females and in 2013 for males, using the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (HPV 6,11,16,18). The HPV.edu study aims to examine: 1) student knowledge about HPV vaccination; 2) psycho-social outcomes and 3) vaccination uptake.
HPV.edu is a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention in schools aiming to recruit 40 schools with year-8 enrolments above 100 students. Intervention schools received the complex intervention, which includes an adolescent intervention, a decisional support tool for parents and adolescents and logistical strategies. Careful process evaluation including an embedded qualitative evaluation was undertaken to explore in depth possible mechanisms for any observed effect of the intervention on primary and secondary outcomes.
The study aims to improve vaccination-related psychosocial outcomes, including adolescent knowledge and attitudes, decision-making involvement, self-efficacy, and to reduce fear and anxiety. The study also aims to improve school vaccination program logistics including reduction in time spent vaccinating adolescents and increased number of consent forms returned (regardless of decision).
|Increasing maternal and childhood vaccine uptake: managing the challenge and opportunity of complementary medicine practitioners||Jane Frawley, Elizabeth Sullivan
||2017-2020||Australian Centre of Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney||This is an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship. The three objectives of this program of research are:
1. Determine the attitudes of CM practitioners towards vaccination and understand if and what they communicate to parents about maternal and childhood vaccination
2. Investigate the willingness and confidence of Australian CM practitioners to answer parents’ questions about vaccination
3. Develop, test and evaluate education resources to support positive, evidence-based conversations about vaccination between CM practitioners and parents.
|Exploration of vaccine-hesitant parents’ beliefs, information seeking and intentions||Jane Frawley, Elizabeth Sullivan
||2016-2017||Australian Centre of Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney||This work aims to:
1. Determine the attitudes and beliefs of vaccine-hesitant parents towards childhood vaccination
2. Determine the information sources parents trust when making decisions about vaccination
3. Determine what affect the recent Australian legislative changes have had on vaccine-hesitant parents’ intentions regarding vaccination.
|The role of midwives in increasing maternal and childhood vaccination uptake||Jane Frawley, Cathrine Fowler, Jon Wardle, Helen Hall, Lynn Sinclair, Allison Cummings||2017-2018||Australian Centre of Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney.
Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne
|This work will explore the facilitators and barriers to effective, evidence-based conversations between midwives and parents about vaccination. It will also determine if midwives have any information needs in relation to maternal and childhood vaccination. This is particularly important now that pertussis (dTpa) and influenza vaccines are routinely recommended during pregnancy.|
|The utilisation of complementary and alternative medicine for children: an examination of parental attitudes and information sources||Jane Frawley, Debra Jackson, Sandy Davidson
||2015-2017||Australian Centre of Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney.
Oxford Brookes University
Endeavour College of Natural Health
|The objective of this project is to explore parental decision-making in relation to health care options and services for their children, including complementary medicine (CM). This project will also evaluate parental attitudes to vaccination amongst CM users.|
|Decision making around vaccination in the attachment parenting community||Jon Wardle, Amie Steel, Jane Frawley
||2016-2018||Australian Centre of Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney||This qualitative project aims to assess factors which support and impose barriers to vaccination, amongst the attachment-parenting community|
|Community vaccine hesitancy service||Shaun Hosein, Sandi Grant, and Andrew Langley||TBD||Queensland Health - Sunshine Coast Public Health Unit||This is a pilot project, where our goal is to provide an in-person consultation service to vaccine hesitant individuals whom require further information and time to discuss concerns with a health care practitioner. This is expected to provide beyond what can be achieved in a busy General Practice, and is intended to support local GP services.
With a successful pilot, we hope to further aid the community through: practical education of health practitioner including students.
|Understanding vaccine attitudes in context||Tomas Rozbroj, Anthony Lyons, Jayne Lucke||2015-2018||La Trobe University||We are using survey data (N≈4,400) to compare 5 vaccine attitude groups in terms of their vaccination behaviour, socio-cultural profiles, broader views, information engagement patterns and knowledge about vaccines. We are also conducting in-depth interviews with vaccine-rejecting Australians to better understand how their attitudes were formed and maintained, and how negative reactions to their vaccine attitudes impact their views.|
|'Hesitant Compliers': Qualitative analysis of concerned fully-vaccinating parents||Stephanie Enkel, Hayley Christian, Katie Attwell, Tom Snelling||February 2015-October 2015||School of Population and Global Health, the University of Western Australia; Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute; Sir Walter Murdoch School of Public Policy and International Affairs, Murdoch University||Guided by a constructivist paradigm, this project aimed to better understand the perspective of ‘Hesitant Compliers’ in Perth, Western Australia. Hesitant compliers were parents identified as adhering to the childhood vaccination schedule but expressed concerns about the immunisation process. Our findings indicated that while parents recognised vaccinations as a method of preventing illness in their children, they were more likely to focus on possible risks than the benefits. Local vaccination events were also identified as fostering adherence or justifying concerns.|
|‘The Midwife Project’||Katie Attwell, Kerrie Wiley, Tom Snelling, Claire Waddington, Julie Leask||2015-2016||Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute; National Centre of Immunisation Research and Surveillance, University of Sydney||In this project the team sought to ascertain what midwives think and feel about childhood vaccination, to discover any interventions trialled in developed countries and to develop and test an educational intervention for midwifery students in Western Australia. A review of the international literature found a spectrum of views deriving from whether midwives were a mainstream or ‘fringe’ provider of maternity care. There have been no interventions to address vaccine hesitancy in midwives. The team developed a research project to address this at the university education level. The project was provisionally conceptualised, constructed and costed but stalled because funding applications were unsuccessful. Some of this knowledge is now being utilised in the MumBubVax project.|
Last updated June 2017